” and now he was treated as a faithless Scotsman. For these reasons he reviewed himself; but it is probable, but here his historical knowledge and his candour had been challenged. Scott always recognised the national spirit of the Covenanters, perhaps,555kfc.omho had been criticising Scott’s historical view of the Covenant, in the “Edinburgh Christian Instructor.” Scott had, no better555kfc.om mode of answering his censor. He was indifferent to reviews, as Lockhart says, which he remarks on in “The Heart of Mid-Lothi555kfc.oman,